{"id":513,"date":"2026-09-05T01:11:49","date_gmt":"2026-09-04T23:11:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nutanix.ma\/index.php\/2026\/09\/05\/nutanix-nc2-on-azure-explained\/"},"modified":"2026-09-05T01:15:48","modified_gmt":"2026-09-04T23:15:48","slug":"nutanix-nc2-on-azure-explained","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nutanix.ma\/index.php\/2026\/09\/05\/nutanix-nc2-on-azure-explained\/","title":{"rendered":"Nutanix NC2 Cloud on Azure Explained"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) on Azure comes up in almost every hybrid-cloud conversation I have now, and most of the time the person asking has a slightly wrong picture of it \u2014 either as &#8220;Nutanix hosting&#8221; or as &#8220;a VM service in Azure.&#8221; It&#8217;s neither. This is a plain explanation of what it actually is, what you&#8217;re responsible for when you run it, and the situations where it&#8217;s the right call. Nutanix&#8217;s own product page is here: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nutanix.com\/products\/nutanix-cloud-clusters\/azure\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) on Azure<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2>What it is, precisely<\/h2>\n<p>NC2 runs the standard Nutanix stack \u2014 AOS, AHV and Prism \u2014 on Azure Bare Metal Infrastructure, inside your own Azure subscription and your own VNet. It is the same software you run in your data centre, on hardware Microsoft owns and you rent by the node. Nutanix&#8217;s own line on this is the right one: NC2 is different because it&#8217;s the <em>same<\/em>. Same data plane, same management plane, same Prism Central console covering on-premises and Azure together.<\/p>\n<p>That has a practical consequence people underestimate: there is no new platform to learn, no application refactoring, and \u2014 because Nutanix licences are portable between on-premises and Azure \u2014 no new licences to buy when you move workloads. A VM that runs on your cluster today runs on NC2 tomorrow with the same tooling, the same snapshots, the same policies.<\/p>\n<h2>What Nutanix handles, and what you handle<\/h2>\n<p>This is the part to get straight before anything else. <strong>NC2 is not a managed service.<\/strong> You decide when, where and how to deploy, expand or pull back \u2014 and you run it. The NC2 Portal automates the parts that would otherwise be painful in a cloud you don&#8217;t physically control: it detects an unplanned node failure and inserts a replacement Azure bare-metal node automatically, and it handles cluster expansion. Software lifecycle is Life Cycle Manager in Prism Central, exactly as on-premises.<\/p>\n<p>For a team already operating Nutanix, that&#8217;s the point. For a team that chose a managed cloud service specifically to stop operating a hypervisor, it&#8217;s a change of model, and it&#8217;s worth being honest about that up front.<\/p>\n<h2>The networking piece is the one to understand<\/h2>\n<p>Flow Virtual Networking is built in, and the specific benefit Nutanix calls out is that it removes the need for ExpressRoute between NC2 and your other Azure VNets. In practice, this is what lets you run &#8220;mixed mode&#8221; applications \u2014 a front end on NC2 talking to Azure SQL, Azure Firewall or an analytics service natively inside your VNet \u2014 without a networking project in between.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s also what makes migration clean. Flow lets you preserve your existing IP ranges and topology when workloads move, so the cutover is a move, not a re-addressing exercise. Anyone who has migrated to a cloud and then spent weeks reconciling firewall rules and DNS will appreciate how much that is worth.<\/p>\n<h2>Where it makes sense<\/h2>\n<p>From the engagements I&#8217;ve seen, four situations justify NC2 clearly:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Disaster recovery.<\/strong> A recovery site you don&#8217;t have to build, in a region of your choosing, running the same stack as production so replication and failover are native. Several of Nutanix&#8217;s published customer stories are DR-led, and it&#8217;s the use case I&#8217;d start with.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Capacity without the procurement wait.<\/strong> NC2 deploys in a few hours. When a project needs capacity now and the hardware lead time is months, that gap is the whole business case.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Migration off VMware in Azure.<\/strong> With Microsoft retiring licence-included Azure VMware Solution, NC2 is the direct alternative \u2014 I&#8217;ve written about that separately <a href=\"https:\/\/nutanix.ma\/index.php\/2026\/09\/05\/avs-bundled-vmware-licensing-retirement-nc2-azure\/\">here<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Extending a Nutanix estate rather than replacing it.<\/strong> If you already run Nutanix on-premises, NC2 is one more cluster in Prism Central, not a second cloud to manage.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Where I&#8217;d be more cautious<\/h2>\n<p>Two situations where NC2 is not automatically the answer. First, <strong>steady-state workloads with no on-premises Nutanix and no plan for one<\/strong> \u2014 the &#8220;same everywhere&#8221; argument only pays off if there&#8217;s an &#8220;everywhere.&#8221; Second, <strong>workloads that would be cheaper or better as native Azure services<\/strong>. NC2 is for things that need to stay as VMs on a consistent platform; it isn&#8217;t a reason to lift-and-shift something that should have been a managed database.<\/p>\n<h2>Commercial model<\/h2>\n<p>NC2 on Azure is available through the Azure Marketplace, and purchases of both the Nutanix software and the Azure bare metal can draw down an existing Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment (MACC). Existing Nutanix licences are portable to it. Nutanix quotes &#8220;up to 53% lower TCO&#8221; against native public cloud \u2014 that&#8217;s from its own data sheet, and one published case study cites 39% savings in cost of operations. Treat both as vendor and customer claims rather than a forecast for your environment, and build your own model on your actual node count and reservation terms.<\/p>\n<h2>Availability and getting started<\/h2>\n<p>NC2 on Azure is available in a range of Azure regions; Nutanix notes West Europe and Germany specifically for European customers, and points to the Deployment and User Guide for the current list. For anyone in Morocco or the wider region, West Europe is the practical starting point for latency.<\/p>\n<p>If you want to see it before committing anything, there are two routes: a free self-guided <strong>Test Drive<\/strong> that needs no setup, or a <strong>free trial<\/strong> that deploys a real cluster in your own Azure account \u2014 and the trial covers both the bare-metal nodes and the Nutanix software, so it&#8217;s a genuine no-cost evaluation.<\/p>\n<h2>Bottom line<\/h2>\n<p>NC2 on Azure is Nutanix in Azure, run by you, with Prism Central over the top. If you already operate Nutanix, it&#8217;s the lowest-friction way to get DR or burst capacity in the cloud that I know of. If you don&#8217;t, evaluate it on the same terms you&#8217;d evaluate any platform you&#8217;ll be operating \u2014 because that&#8217;s what it is.<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;re weighing NC2 up for DR or for an AVS exit and want a second opinion on the design, <a href=\"https:\/\/nutanix.ma\/index.php\/contact-me\/\">get in touch<\/a>.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><em>Source: Nutanix, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nutanix.com\/products\/nutanix-cloud-clusters\/azure\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) on Azure<\/a> product page. TCO and savings figures quoted are Nutanix&#8217;s and its customers&#8217; stated results, not independent benchmarks.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) on Azure comes up in almost every hybrid-cloud conversation I have now, and most of the time the person asking has a slightly wrong picture of it \u2014 either as &#8220;Nutanix hosting&#8221; or as &#8220;a VM service in Azure.&#8221; It&#8217;s neither. This is a plain explanation of what it actually is, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-513","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-infrastructure"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nutanix.ma\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/513","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nutanix.ma\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nutanix.ma\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nutanix.ma\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nutanix.ma\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=513"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/nutanix.ma\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/513\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":515,"href":"https:\/\/nutanix.ma\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/513\/revisions\/515"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nutanix.ma\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=513"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nutanix.ma\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=513"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nutanix.ma\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=513"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}